Google Bard vs Bing AI,10 Differences: Battle of Giants

Introduction

Everyone is curious to know the winner when we talk about Google Bard vs Microsoft Bing AI. The new Google BERT-based AI language model, aptly dubbed “Google BARD,” is the article’s focus, which details Google’s recent achievements in AI language models. Another well-known AI language model is Microsoft’s Bing Chatbot, and this article draws parallels between the two.

The article compares Google BARD to Microsoft’s Bing Chatbot, an AI language model that can understand natural language queries. The report compares and contrasts the two models and concludes that Google BARD is better at answering complicated questions, but Bing Chatbot is more friendly and easy to talk to.

Those paying attention to AI right now will notice that new companies constantly develop new products. Google Bard AI, OpenAI’s GPT-4, and Microsoft’s new Bing AI Chat contributed to the chaos. The hard part is figuring out which options are good or bad. While each AI chatbot has its own set of strengths, some are more effective than others. We previously compared Google Bard and ChatGPT, and the findings were quite illuminating. Today, however, we’ll contrast Microsoft Bing AI Chat, a GPT-4-powered search engine with tremendous success, with Google’s first-ever chatbot. Which artificial intelligence (AI) should you use for your day-to-day tasks, and which has the best capabilities? Let’s not wait any longer and check it out now.

Google Bard vs Microsoft Bing AI: Key Differences

Google Bard vs Microsoft Bing AI discussion is not going to end soon. Both chatbots, as we’ve seen, offer their users benefits. Let’s compare and contrast the most prominent features of the top AI search engines and determine which one is the best.

1. Independent Models

Artificially intelligent chatbots Google Bard and Microsoft Bing have been trained using data. Simply put, the bots have scraped this data and learned what they could from it. They then utilize the data to provide solutions to user-generated questions and scenarios. However, the language models used by Bard and Bing are fundamentally different.

To begin, Google Bard is predicated on a condensed version of Google’s language model, dubbed LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications). We have seen LaMDA vs GPT. Google’s language model is best for natural speech, original thought processes, and new text-making. Bard says that the training data for LaMDA comes from a wide range of textual and coding sources. Google says its model is more conversational than Bing because it “can engage in a free-flowing way about a seemingly endless number of topics.”

On the other hand, Bing is founded on the Prometheus model of the same company, which we now know to be GPT-4. Compared to previous versions of OpenAI’s LLM, GPT-4 is the superior option. The GPT-4 model was built to respond quickly with sound logic. But the company has also considered the nuances of conversation by training the model on many high-quality discussions between people. In addition, compared to its previous models, GPT-4 includes cutting-edge characteristics like multimodality and language support.

There isn’t a standout option here, but GPT-4 does have some advantages over the competition. So, there is no winner from both giants.

2. The Plagiarism of Google’s “Bard”

This is one of the main differences to date in Google Bard vs Bing AI. Despite these claims, Google’s LaMDA model has trouble coming up with novel text and carrying on natural conversations. In this case, the comparison I just referred to is our most recent discussion with Bard. One time in the One Piece anime, when Google Bard was questioned about Luffy and Haki, he copied and pasted several lines from an article. Surprisingly, it needed to cite its sources.

We’re not the only ones who’ve had this happen to them. Tom’s Hardware editor-in-chief Avram Piltch recently tweeted evidence of Bard’s plagiarism from Tom’s Hardware. Even though Bard fixed the problem after being told about it, the fact that it plagiarized in the first place needs to be revised.

So, #GoogleBard admitted that it plagiarized from @tomshardware and apologized when I prompted it. This is a plagiarism engine. pic.twitter.com/38S2vNxrTj

— Avram Piltch (@geekinchief) March 22, 2023

Microsoft: Unlike Google, Bing did not steal texts when queried about various topics. In addition, we put several texts through our collection of top AI plagiarism checkers and came up empty. Furthermore, Bing Chat will not write you an essay in creative mode, claiming that doing so would be unethical and a form of plagiarism.

This is an excellent improvement to Bing Chat, and I hope it sticks around. Unfortunately, in our testing, Google Bard did not perform as well. We hope Google recognizes this as a problem and implements safeguards to prevent further harm to publications and independent creators, as this has happened more than once. It would be great if AI chatbots didn’t just paraphrase texts without giving credit where credit is due and included a link to the original work in the footnotes. In the end, we can say that “Bing is the winner.”

3. Microsoft Bing AI Provides Citations

It’s encouraging to see Microsoft Bing continue to show creativity in response to different query types. However, Bing also does something right by including in-text citations of its sources of inspiration. The user can benefit from this feature by double-checking their work to see if the bot has copied anything. No matter what you ask, Microsoft Bing will keep providing sources and even insert them into the text itself.

This is a vast improvement compared to Google Bard, which typically provides unreliable results. When questioned about its lack of citations, Google Bard AI explains that it does not include them because it is not an academic researcher. However, Google Bard notes that it can only deliver the accuracy of the information it has been trained on. While this won’t prevent the chatbot from having hallucinations, it does show that Google is taking the necessary precautions with Bard.

There are several differences between ChatGPT and other famous chatbots. AI chatbots like ChatGPT should never replace human researchers, but MS Bing’s incorporation of sources does show progress toward making AI more trustworthy. Therefore, Bing is the victor.

4. Google Bard is a lot Quicker

Historically, Google’s response times have been legendary. The search engine returns results instantly, no matter what you type in. Thankfully, Google Bard AI continues in the same vein. When a query is entered, it takes Bard more than three seconds to give a complete answer. Essays, poems, jokes, and other works of great complexity fall into this category. When it came to getting an answer quickly, Bard AI’s speed was remarkable.

Microsoft Bing AI, on the other hand, is slower. The robot composes an answer as it goes through the motions mentally. Like Bard’s answers, most people’s responses are typed one letter at a time. The result is a significant boost in speed for Bard compared to Bing, Microsoft’s search engine. Bing does its homework but needs to be faster.

If you’re looking for an artificial intelligence bot and speed is your top priority, Google Bard is your best bet.

5. Microsoft Bing AI Can Make Pictures

This feature is not available to everyone everywhere. The LaMDA model in Google Bard has many applications, but image generation isn’t one of them. But Microsoft’s AI Bing can now understand questions and create pictures independently. OpenAI’s DALL-E model is used by the Bing Image Creator to process image suggestions and make high-quality artwork automatically. The AI search engine is now the only place to create visual and textual content.

The Bing Image Creator has yet to be made available worldwide, though. But even in those cases, Bing can still look up pictures online and give you a detailed description. Some top AI art makers also allow you to upload your images as inspiration. If you need more specific instructions for the generators, Bing can provide those.

There has yet to be an indication from Google Bard that it can create images. Microsoft’s Bing Chat feature can do both in this Bard vs. Bing battle. Support may be added in the future.

6. Microsoft Bing AI is a Coding Genius

Google’s page of answers to questions about Bard makes it clear that it can’t help with programming yet. Although support may be added later on, it is currently unavailable. Nonetheless, we ran Bard through some coding iterations, and its output is simple enough to be used as a model. Unfortunately, ChatGPT discovered some of this code needs to be fixed, consistent with what Google notes. Even though Bard says it can code in multiple languages, it completely breaks down in a complicated situation.

However, Microsoft Bing excels at translating user-conjured scenarios into code. This includes making websites and apps, taking special orders, and more. Similarly, when we asked Bing to help us “Write a shell script to compress PNG files in a folder with zopfli,” a helpful suggestion we found on Twitter, it delivered. While Bing will be flawed, it will do a much better job assisting programmers under challenging situations than Google Bard. Bing gets an A+ from coders who value that feature in a search engine.

7. Bing AI Remembers More Than Google

One of ChatGPT’s best features is that it can remember specific details about past conversations. While it does not directly draw on previous answers when formulating new ones, the bot does remember its prior roles. You can train it to act as a spell checker, coder, and many other functions, and it will immediately take on those personas.

Microsoft Bing mimics Bing Chat’s extensive history keeping. Bing AI was delighted to play the part of a spell checker and examine the accuracy of your input. Throughout my use of the bot, it remembered its assigned task and repeatedly corrected my spelling. In addition to spelling, this also considers the author’s tone. Microsoft Bing can be customized to the individual’s preferences, turning it into an intelligent assistant.

Unfortunately, Google Bard’s memory is currently terrible. The chatbot did agree when I asked it to fix my misspelled words. However, when presented with an incorrectly spelled paragraph, Bard promptly forgot its purpose. It failed to pick up where it left off and had to be reminded of its duties. The good news is that Google has acknowledged this, saying, “Bard’s ability to hold context is purposely limited for now.” However, this should change as the bot acquires more knowledge, and perhaps we will learn more about its capabilities at Google I/O 2023.

While Google Bard’s preview provides some insight into its usefulness, you shouldn’t rely on it to give it a backstory or keep track of your conversations.

8. Bing AI Can Be used In Several Ways

For example, Microsoft didn’t stop giving its chatbot a large memory; it also fine-tuned its responses. The Bing Chat bot can have its tone and wordiness adjusted to fit a variety of conversational styles. Bing lets you choose between three different types: “More Creative,” “More Balanced,” and “More Precise.”

Creativity, as the name suggests, stimulates creative thinking in the robot. The author of Balanced manages to strike a nice balance between fiction and reality. At last, Precise gets down to business with Bing AI, initiating a brief and direct conversation. Depending on your specific needs, you may favor one usage scenario over another. Microsoft’s new conversational options improve accuracy significantly.

Unfortunately, Google Bard has few options regarding varying speech patterns. However, this does not imply that the bot is unwelcoming or unhelpful. It makes reasonable attempts to respond to your queries and produces valuable results. Unfortunately, the chatbot only appears to have one mode at the moment, and its memory could be more spotless, so you can only do so much with it.

9. Google Bard offers multiple drafts of his works

Bard may not be as flexible as Microsoft Bing, but it has a few tricks. The “Drafts” feature is one of the most exciting aspects of Google’s new chatbot. If you ask the bot a question, it will give you three variations of the same response. Users can peruse all options and select the one they feel best addresses their question. While both drafts are well-detailed, there are occasions when one solution is preferable to the other.

Google Bard has been used to draft texts to ensure the AI doesn’t appear overbearing. Due to the need for a definitive solution, users can combine them as they see fit.

But Bing only provides one version of its answer, which may need to be more definitive to some users. Though additional responses are available upon request, they are not provided automatically. Since those unfamiliar with the bot won’t be able to benefit from Bard’s nuanced and detailed information, there are better courses of action.

We look forward to seeing if Bing responds to Bard by releasing its draft functionality. But at the moment, Google Bard has a big advantage over Bing because it can give more than one answer.

10. Bing AI Supports Multiple Languages

At this point, Google Bard can hardly be called a search engine. People will still try to use it as a weapon despite this. And for a search engine to be handy, it must provide results in a wide range of languages. For the time being, Google Bard only works with US English. The company has confirmed this and says that support for additional languages is on the way. But, interestingly, Bard is convinced the language is compatible with others. However, the program needs to be better when writing poetry in German.

However, Bing can be used in several different languages. This gives Microsoft’s chatbot more options and allows it to write poetry, essays, recipes, and other things in different languages. Even though GPT-4 is known to support more than 26 languages, Microsoft has not said which languages Bing supports. Bing AI, when asked, says it can understand languages like English, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, French, and German. We also had Bing compose poetry in languages we didn’t specify, which did just fine with that.

Google Bard’s international availability is currently very restricted. Bing Chat is the best option for those needing a search engine that supports multiple languages.

Winner: Google Bard vs  Microsoft Bing AI

It’s always challenging to pick just one winner when we talk ‘Google Bard vs Microsoft Bing AI’. Google’s Bard and Microsoft’s Bing Chatbot are highly advanced artificial intelligence chatbots. Bing is conscientious regarding sources and people, but Bard can respond quickly and give drafts. Bing, however, walks that fine line and emerges victorious.

There are numerous benefits to using Microsoft Bing. The AI-driven search engine/chatbot is a skilled communicator thanks to the most recent generation of GPT-4 LLM. The bot combines this with careful data mining to show users where they can find the information they need. But Bing is more than up to the task of content creation as well; the bot can effortlessly code elaborate scenarios. Bing’s support for multiple languages and automatic image creation with AI add even more AI benefits for everyone.

Google Bard is still in beta, so it’s fair to treat it cautiously. Nonetheless, the bot would pose at least some competition to market leaders like Bing and ChatGPT. This is a sneak peek at something that, with more time, could be fantastic. I’m confident that Bard will improve with training and user interaction, but Bing Chat is the superior service for now. Many are using ChatGPT to start businesses, but Bard is still struggling.

You will not easily find a winner for “Google Bard vs Microsoft Bing AI”, as Your experience may differ from mine, but that’s life. Depending on your needs and expectations, Bard could be the best or worst artificial intelligence (AI) ever made. It would help if you made a choice.

FAQs

Do you want to read more? Check out these articles.